|
Attached Files:
LISD_gbba_amend.pdf
Previous Post: LISD School Board Meeting - 10/19/2009 - Next Post: Texas Blog Roundup - Week ending 10/18/09
| Bookmark this article at these sites |
|---|
Share on Facebook
|
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| TJGilmore | Posted: 2009/10/19 8:40 Updated: 2009/10/19 8:40 |
![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/9/17 From: Posts: 6 |
Really? What if I just want information and I happen to post on facebook? Am I now a citizen journalist? This is plain silly. Sorry I'm blogging the City Council tonight. Please feel free to fill out a card in my name against this.
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2009/10/19 12:07 Updated: 2009/10/19 12:32 |
|
LISD--Committed to Silence
|
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| kjudk1955 | Posted: 2009/10/19 14:04 Updated: 2009/10/19 14:04 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/4/26 From: Lewisville, TX Posts: 15 |
Just a thought -- this might get a little sticky with enforcement if they go through with it.
During "the speech" issue, I was able to call and talk with three different LISD officials (including the Superintendent) outside of the school board in order to clarify the district position. I spoke with them as a citizen. I do not have a blog, but occasionally post a comment here and at one other (national) blog. On that occasion, I posted an account of my conversations with Dr. Roy and others, mainly to share what I knew on the policy itself regarding the president's speech. (If some of you recall, I was also complimentary of Dr. Roy's character, based on his willingness to speak with me for 20 minutes and his taking full responsibility for the decision.) So...if this policy is implemented, are they going to ask citizens for their credentials before they speak with them? Will this make Steve off limits from district officials ever granting him some time to talk about an issue, even as a parent of children in LISD, simply because he has a blog? Will they speak with some citizens and clarify issues for them, but reserve the right to not speak with others based on history of them posting to blogs? This could be a very slippery slope -- I'm not sure they want to go there. I also see potential for alliances between liberal and conservative bloggers in opposition to a policy change. We all have people that we'd rather not talk to -- and find ways to avoid it on occasion, at least until we're prepared to do so. They (district officials) are as savvy about this as any of us. I'm just not sure it's all that smart to put your intentions to invoke personal biases in writing. My two cents. |
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2009/10/19 16:14 Updated: 2009/10/19 16:20 |
|
Something similar happened with REALTORS in the Northwest USA regarding blogging about properties for sell by Realtors. Tracy Sichterman, a Realtor, commented regarding the new regulation. I have changed her words to fit LISD's proposed new rules for non-traditional/social media, because I found what she had to say very enlightening and very well said. You can find the original article with her original words here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/o ... ock/detail?entry_id=49848
"If you try to regulate the Internet, you only end up screening out the 'real voices.' Blocking contrary opinions on the web is deceitful. An ethical school district will disclose information to those in all media--traditional and social. You cannot opt to share information with only paid/traditional/credentialed media in hopes to screen out potentially negative opinion. We need to embrace transparency in the Lewisville ISD." Allie |
|
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| WhosPlayin | Posted: 2009/10/19 19:15 Updated: 2009/10/19 19:16 |
Webmaster ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/12/12 From: Posts: 917 |
The School Board voted unanimously (as they vote in every case) to accept the new policy. Some board members did question the intent and effect of the policy, and staff did answer as to intent, saying that this codified current standard operating procedure. Staff presented some false choice arguments, such as whether the district would have to respond to 150 bloggers requesting to video students in schools - a situation that could result in a violation of student privacy rights.
Board members did not ask Permetti or others the important questions like: - How often this happens? - When was the last time 150 bloggers wanted to get interviews? - When do bloggers compete for time with traditional media? - What is considered an interview? - Why does the district need a policy of having its communications department censor its employees? I am disappointed in this board for its apparent willingness to buy the arguments of its staff at face value without the attempt to dive in and ask some challenging questions. Now I am curious to know whether there has been any time in recent history when one board member has dissented from anything recommended by staff. Video is forthcoming. |
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| WhosPlayin | Posted: 2009/10/20 13:43 Updated: 2009/10/20 13:43 |
Webmaster ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/12/12 From: Posts: 917 |
Flower Mound Leader has a story about this decision:
http://www.scntx.com/articles/2009/10 ... _mound_leader/news/31.txt |
|
|


The Calendar
Our Polls
Our Videos
On The Facebook
As a purposeful slap in the face to citizen journalists and institutions such as this blog, Lewisville ISD has on its agenda tonight 













