Login to Comment
User:
Pass:
Remember me
Lost your password?
Create New Account
Texas Progressive Alliance
Other Good Websites
Recent Photos with thumbs
Recent News and Blog Posts
Latest Reader Diaries
Recent Reader Comments

LISD Board Considering Change in Media Policy: Bloggers Not Welcomed

The Nimrods Never Cease to Amaze Me
Posted by WhosPlayin on 2009/10/19 8:20:00 (658 reads)

As a purposeful slap in the face to citizen journalists and institutions such as this blog, Lewisville ISD has on its agenda tonight a policy change intended to squelch district cooperation with bloggers:

District officials shall cooperate with the news media to ensure complete and accurate coverage of all news and events. District officials may turn down an interview request if official press credentials are not presented or available.
To be considered a member of the media, reporters should be employed by a print or broadcast media outlet that has an official publication with a formal form of distribution. Broadcast media outlets are required to have an official timed newscast measured by the Neilson Rating System.


We're fighting this. Join us tonight at 7pm at the school board meeting.
Bolin Administrative Center, 1565 W. Main Street, Lewisville, Texas

(Note: link above was updated - original link stopped working. You can find the document by going here and clicking the agenda packet for today, then selecting the link on "GBBA(LOCAL).pdf"

Update: One of our readers points out the Supreme Court ruling in the case of Lowell v. City of Griffin, in which the opinion stated:
"The liberty of the press is not confined to newspapers and periodicals. It necessarily embraces pamphlets and leaflets. These indeed have been historic weapons in the defense of liberty, as the pamphlets of Thomas Paine and others in our own history abundantly attest. The press in its connotation comprehends every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion. What we have had recent occasion to say with respect to the vital importance of protecting this essential liberty from every sort of infringement need not be repeated. Near v. Minnesota, supra; Grosjean v. American Press Company, supra; De Jonge v. Oregon, supra. 2

The ordinance cannot be saved because it relates to distribution and not to publication. 'Liberty of circulating is as essential to that freedom as liberty of publishing; indeed, without the circulation, the publication would be of little value.' Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727 , 733. The license tax in Grosjean v. American Press Company, supra, was held invalid because of its direct tendency to restrict circulation."


Update #2: Uploaded a copy of the PDF file for the agenda item, since the Boardbook site that hosts the file seems to change the link each time it is used.

Update #3: Here's an interesting video explaining why you ignore social media at your peril:

(Hat tip to S.W.)

Attached Files: LISD_gbba_amend.pdf 


Bookmark this article at these sites

Share on Facebook                    

 
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Poster Thread
TJGilmore
Posted: 2009/10/19 8:40  Updated: 2009/10/19 8:40
Joined: 2009/9/17
From:
Posts: 6
 Re: LISD Board Considering Change in Media Policy: Blogg...
Really? What if I just want information and I happen to post on facebook? Am I now a citizen journalist? This is plain silly. Sorry I'm blogging the City Council tonight. Please feel free to fill out a card in my name against this.
Reply

Poster Thread
Anonymous
Posted: 2009/10/19 11:57  Updated: 2009/10/19 12:32
 Re: LISD Board Considering Change in Media Policy: Blogg...
Sounds like LISD is afraid of certain political blogs getting to the truth of matters. I don't agree with much of what is written on this blog, but for LISD to begin banning bloggers *on both sides* from interviewing officials is uncalled for and unnecessary. Perhaps I don't want to get all my information from large news organizations such as The Dallas Morning News and their publications, the Lewisville Leader or The Lewisville News. This is an attempt by LISD to squelch voices, plain and simple, because they are AFRAID.
Reply

Poster Thread
Anonymous
Posted: 2009/10/19 12:07  Updated: 2009/10/19 12:32
 Re: LISD Board Considering Change in Media Policy: Blogg...
LISD--Committed to Silence
Reply

Poster Thread
kjudk1955
Posted: 2009/10/19 14:04  Updated: 2009/10/19 14:04
Just popping in
Joined: 2007/4/26
From: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 15
 LISD Bloggers Ban
Just a thought -- this might get a little sticky with enforcement if they go through with it.

During "the speech" issue, I was able to call and talk with three different LISD officials (including the Superintendent) outside of the school board in order to clarify the district position. I spoke with them as a citizen.

I do not have a blog, but occasionally post a comment here and at one other (national) blog. On that occasion, I posted an account of my conversations with Dr. Roy and others, mainly to share what I knew on the policy itself regarding the president's speech. (If some of you recall, I was also complimentary of Dr. Roy's character, based on his willingness to speak with me for 20 minutes and his taking full responsibility for the decision.)

So...if this policy is implemented, are they going to ask citizens for their credentials before they speak with them? Will this make Steve off limits from district officials ever granting him some time to talk about an issue, even as a parent of children in LISD, simply because he has a blog?

Will they speak with some citizens and clarify issues for them, but reserve the right to not speak with others based on history of them posting to blogs?

This could be a very slippery slope -- I'm not sure they want to go there. I also see potential for alliances between liberal and conservative bloggers in opposition to a policy change.

We all have people that we'd rather not talk to -- and find ways to avoid it on occasion, at least until we're prepared to do so. They (district officials) are as savvy about this as any of us. I'm just not sure it's all that smart to put your intentions to invoke personal biases in writing.

My two cents.
Reply

Poster Thread
Anonymous
Posted: 2009/10/19 16:14  Updated: 2009/10/19 16:20
 Re: LISD Board Considering Change in Media Policy: Blogg...
Something similar happened with REALTORS in the Northwest USA regarding blogging about properties for sell by Realtors. Tracy Sichterman, a Realtor, commented regarding the new regulation. I have changed her words to fit LISD's proposed new rules for non-traditional/social media, because I found what she had to say very enlightening and very well said. You can find the original article with her original words here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/o ... ock/detail?entry_id=49848

"If you try to regulate the Internet, you only end up screening out the 'real voices.' Blocking contrary opinions on the web is deceitful. An ethical school district will disclose information to those in all media--traditional and social. You cannot opt to share information with only paid/traditional/credentialed media in hopes to screen out potentially negative opinion. We need to embrace transparency in the Lewisville ISD."

Allie
Reply

Poster Thread
Anonymous
Posted: 2009/10/20 16:20  Updated: 2009/10/20 16:45
 Re: LISD Board Considering Change in Media Policy: Blogg...
Thanks Allie for the repost.

@berkhills
AKA Tracy Sichterman
Reply

Poster Thread
WhosPlayin
Posted: 2009/10/19 19:15  Updated: 2009/10/19 19:16
Webmaster
Joined: 2008/12/12
From:
Posts: 917
 We lost.
The School Board voted unanimously (as they vote in every case) to accept the new policy. Some board members did question the intent and effect of the policy, and staff did answer as to intent, saying that this codified current standard operating procedure. Staff presented some false choice arguments, such as whether the district would have to respond to 150 bloggers requesting to video students in schools - a situation that could result in a violation of student privacy rights.

Board members did not ask Permetti or others the important questions like:
- How often this happens?
- When was the last time 150 bloggers wanted to get interviews?
- When do bloggers compete for time with traditional media?
- What is considered an interview?
- Why does the district need a policy of having its communications department censor its employees?

I am disappointed in this board for its apparent willingness to buy the arguments of its staff at face value without the attempt to dive in and ask some challenging questions.

Now I am curious to know whether there has been any time in recent history when one board member has dissented from anything recommended by staff.

Video is forthcoming.
Reply

Poster Thread
WhosPlayin
Posted: 2009/10/20 13:43  Updated: 2009/10/20 13:43
Webmaster
Joined: 2008/12/12
From:
Posts: 917
 Flower Mound Leader Article
Flower Mound Leader has a story about this decision:
http://www.scntx.com/articles/2009/10 ... _mound_leader/news/31.txt
Reply
Custom Search
Powered by XOOPS © 2001-2008 The XOOPS Project